The Lake Champlain Basin Program is committed to advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion across our work. In response to the U.S. federal Justice40 Initiative and corresponding Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance, LCBP has developed a definition of ‘communities with disadvantages’ to guide funding decisions. LCBP has set a goal that 40% of funds distributed through our grant programs will support projects that benefit disadvantaged audiences, occur in communities identified as disadvantaged, or have demonstrable benefits to disadvantaged communities.
The criteria included in LCBP’s definition of communities with disadvantages will be an additional consideration for funding projects that meet the objectives of LCBP’s management plan Opportunities for Action: an Evolving Plan for the Future of the Lake Champlain Basin.
Questions relating to LCBP’s definition of communities with disadvantages can be directed to Mae Kate Campbell, LCBP Associate Scientist (email@example.com).
The following definition applies to US-based projects. Please see below for information on Québec-based projects.
For LCBP funding purposes, a community is considered disadvantaged if it meets any one or more of the following criteria:
|High School Degree Non-Attainment
|≥ 15% of the population age 25+ has an education level less than a high-school diploma
|Housing Cost Burden
|The ratio of monthly gross rent + utilities to monthly household income (renters) or the percentage of household income that goes towards mortgage payments, real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, and fuels (owners) is ≥ 35%
|Lack of Access to Complete Plumbing Facilities
|The % of households who lack complete plumbing facilities (hot and cold running water and a bathtub or shower) is ≥ 5%
|Linguistic isolation/limited English proficiency
|The percentage of households in which no one over the age of 14 speaks English “very well” is ≥ 1%
|Median household income
|The percentage of households earning less than 80% of the area median income is ≥ 50%
|National School Lunch Program Eligibility
|The number of students eligible for the National School Lunch Program is ≥ 50%
|The percentage of households whose annual income is <200% of the federal poverty limit is ≥ 40%
|Estimated Prevalence of Cancer
|The estimated prevalence of all-cause cancer (excluding skin cancer) among adults 18 and older is greater than for 66.66% of U.S. census tracts (2020)
|Prevalence of Mobile/Manufactured Homes
|The percentage of houses that are mobile/manufactured homes is ≥ 15%
|The percentage of the population in the workforce who are unemployed is ≥ 7.5%
|Sites of Cultural Importance
|Any project that will occur on a site of cultural importance
|Any project than can demonstrate direct benefit to a community with disadvantages, regardless of geographic location
LCBP’s communities with disadvantages mapping tool is available here or by clicking on the button below.
Technical documentation describing the sources and application of the datasets used in LCBP’s definition and map is available here.
Proposed projects that meet the objectives of Opportunities for Action will be identified as meeting LCBP’s definition of communities with disadvantages if any one or more of the following criteria are met:
For projects based in Québec, LCBP will be following the Indice de vitalité économique des localités et des MRC du Québec (Economic vitality index of Québec localities and RCMs), published by the Institut de la statistique du Québec. More information about the Economic Vitality Index is available here, and the corresponding mapping tool is available here.
For LCBP-funding purposes, Québec-based projects will be identified as meeting LCBP’s communities with disadvantages definition if one or more of the following criteria are met:
Examples: A land conservation project that would increase recreational access opportunities to nearby least economically vitalized localities, an educational project implemented at a school that serves students from nearby least economically vitalized communities.
LCBP recognizes that this definition and related mapping tool may not capture all factors that can contribute to a community being disadvantaged. We encourage grant applicants to include a justification of how their project will benefit communities with disadvantages, including any accompanying data where possible.
Any project that is determined to meet the criteria outlined in LCBP’s definition of communities with disadvantages will be given additional weight in the proposal evaluation process. LCBP will use a tiered system to evaluate how much additional weight a proposal will be given according to the guidelines below. Projects that demonstrate a direct benefit to populations identified as disadvantaged (not just to a geographic area identified as disadvantaged) and demonstrate meaningful involvement with communities with disadvantages will be more competitive in the proposal evaluation process.
“Meaningful Involvement” means that: (1) potentially affected community residents have an appropriate opportunity to participate in decisions about a proposed activity that will affect their environment and/or health; (2) the public’s contribution can influence the decision-making process; (3) the concerns of all participants involved will be considered in the decision-making process; and (4) the decision-makers seek out and facilitate the involvement of those potentially affected.
|The project will benefit a disadvantaged community that meets multiple criteria included in LCBP’s definition AND demonstrates meaningful involvement from the selected community
|A water-quality workforce development program in a community with high unemployment and high school degree non-attainment; a project to address flooding at a mobile home park in a census block with a high poverty rate
|The project will benefit a disadvantaged community that meets one criterion included in LCBP’s definition AND demonstrates meaningful involvement from the selected community
|A project to assist low-income homeowners with installing best-management practices on their property in a census block with high poverty rates
|The project will take place in a disadvantaged community meeting multiple criteria, but the work proposed does not demonstrate meaningful involvement from the selected community
|A dam removal project in a community with high lack of access to indoor plumbing and high National School Lunch Program eligibility
|The project will take place in a disadvantaged community that meets one criterion, but the work proposed does not demonstrate meaningful involvement from the selected community
|A streambank stabilization project in a census block with high linguistic isolation
LCBP staff, in coordination with confidential external peer reviewers selected for each grant category, will evaluate the degree to which a project meets the criteria outlined in LCBP’s definition of disadvantaged community. Please refer to a specific Request For Proposals (RFP) for more information on how communities with disadvantages criteria will be considered in that grant category’s evaluation process.
LCBP reviewed relevant federal and state agency definitions of ‘disadvantaged’ or ‘environmental justice’ communities to identify datasets commonly included in these definitions1. LCBP selected a suite of criteria to be included in our definition, following EPA guidance and consideration of commonly used datasets that align with LCBP’s mission. A public comment period on the proposed criteria was held in November-December 2022.
Following review of public comments received, the Lake Champlain Steering Committee approved an interim disadvantaged community definition in December 2022. LCBP then developed a mapping tool to assist with identifying the locations of communities with disadvantages per LCBP’s definition.
LCBP held a second public comment period on the definition and mapping tool in May-June, 2023. The Lake Champlain Steering Committee reviewed public comments and approved a finalized definition of “communities with disadvantages” to guide LCBP funding decisions in June 2023. The Lake Champlain Steering Committee intends to review this definition annually.
1Definitions reviewed include: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s Environmental Justice Indicator, The Center for Disease Control and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s Social Vulnerability Index, The Council on Environmental Quality’s Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool, EPA’s Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool, The New York State Climate Justice Working Group’s draft Disadvantaged Communities Criteria, Québec Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Economic Vitality Index, Vermont Act No. 154. An act relating to environmental justice in Vermont
LCBP recognizes that communities can be impacted by factors that are not solely related to socioeconomic indicators. In addition to the socioeconomic criteria that are used in LCBP’s definition of communities with disadvantages, proposals should clearly demonstrate how the proposed project will address or improve environmental quality concerns across the intended project area, and how these concerns align with LCBP’s mission and management goals identified within Opportunities for Action. The degree to which a community is impacted by any one or more of these environmental quality indicators will be weighed to help prioritize projects within communities with disadvantages.